Introductory Notes to a Speculative Epistemology of Archaeology
I recently defended my thesis which is available online here (minus the articles).
Introductory Notes to a Speculative Epistemology of Archaeology
I recently defended my thesis which is available online here (minus the articles).
Slow Science for Fast Archaeology
Article available online now (open-access).
Slow Science for Fast Archaeology
Article available online now (open-access).
Finnish reactions to the New Archaeology
In a recent article, I explored Finnish reactions to the New Archaeology in and after the 1970s. Full text pdf access is now possible via the Fennoscandia archaeologica journal website (http://www.sarks.fi/fa/PDF/FA35_19.pdf).
Finnish reactions to the New Archaeology
In a recent article, I explored Finnish reactions to the New Archaeology in and after the 1970s. Full text pdf access is now possible via the Fennoscandia archaeologica journal website (http://www.sarks.fi/fa/PDF/FA35_19.pdf).
Kulttuurintutkimuksen selviöistä
Miten paradigma – itsestäänselvyyksien järjestelmä – toimii tavallisessa, paradigman varaan rakentuvassa normaalitieteessä? Veli Verronen on oivasti selventänyt paradigman käsitettä väitöskirjassaan The growth of knowledge (1986). Hän erottaa paradigman kolme pääasiallista merkitystä: metafyysinen, sosiologinen ja konkreettinen paradigma. Katson seuraavassa mitä ne
Kulttuurintutkimuksen selviöistä
Miten paradigma – itsestäänselvyyksien järjestelmä – toimii tavallisessa, paradigman varaan rakentuvassa normaalitieteessä? Veli Verronen on oivasti selventänyt paradigman käsitettä väitöskirjassaan The growth of knowledge (1986). Hän erottaa paradigman kolme pääasiallista merkitystä: metafyysinen, sosiologinen ja konkreettinen paradigma. Katson seuraavassa mitä ne
Pragmaticism – the new possibility of a scientific archaeology as seen in the light of the history of archaeology
An old paper of mine, originally written in 2011 or 2012, is now out in the Baltic series Interarchaeologia. It can be found by following this link to academia.edu.
Pragmaticism – the new possibility of a scientific archaeology as seen in the light of the history of archaeology
An old paper of mine, originally written in 2011 or 2012, is now out in the Baltic series Interarchaeologia. It can be found by following this link to academia.edu.
Animal pragmatism
My contribution to the 2012 EAA session Animal agency? is now available in extended article draft form over at academia.edu. The paper is called Animal pragmatism. Take a look if you’re interested. It’s unlikely the paper will ever be published.
Animal pragmatism
My contribution to the 2012 EAA session Animal agency? is now available in extended article draft form over at academia.edu. The paper is called Animal pragmatism. Take a look if you’re interested. It’s unlikely the paper will ever be published.
Things in Action – Interpreting the Meanings of Things in Archaeology
The proceedings of the XII Nordic Theoretical Archaeology Group Meeting held in Oulu, Finland, two years ago is now out. My contribution can be found by following this link.
Things in Action – Interpreting the Meanings of Things in Archaeology
The proceedings of the XII Nordic Theoretical Archaeology Group Meeting held in Oulu, Finland, two years ago is now out. My contribution can be found by following this link.
Understanding the archaeological record
You will find my review of Gavin Lucas’ Understanding the archaeological record in the latest issue of Fennoscandia archaeologica (XXX).
Understanding the archaeological record
You will find my review of Gavin Lucas’ Understanding the archaeological record in the latest issue of Fennoscandia archaeologica (XXX).
Article on abduction out
My article on abductive inference in archaeology can be found in the most recent issue of Muinaistutkija (3/2013). In it I argued for the fallible and open-ended nature of archaeological epistemology. With some examples from the history of archaeology I
Article on abduction out
My article on abductive inference in archaeology can be found in the most recent issue of Muinaistutkija (3/2013). In it I argued for the fallible and open-ended nature of archaeological epistemology. With some examples from the history of archaeology I
